Thu 19 October 2006; 291

NYT writes about risque halloween costumes

23:50 Thu 19 October 2006; 291 | by Ryan | in uncategorized

There’s an interesting story in the NYTimes about over-sexualized hallowe’en costumes for girls. The article quotes professor Nelson from Waterloo.

Good Girls Go Bad, for a Day 19 Oct 2006 By Stephanie R

Dr. Nelson, a professor of sociology at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, said the trend toward overtly sexualized costumes actually begins with little girls. “Heroic figures for women or considered icons of femininity are very much anchored in the femme fatale imagery,� she said, adding that those include an assortment of Disney heroines, witches, cocktail waitresses, French maids and an “interchangeable variety of beauty queens.�While researching “Pink Dragon,� Dr. Nelson found that even costumes for little girls were gendered. Boys got to be computers while the girls were cupcakes. Today, there are bride costumes for little girls but one is hard pressed to find groom costumes for little boys. Additionally, Dr. Nelson said, the girls’ costumes are designed in ways that create the semblance of a bust where there is none. “Once they’re older women it’s just a continuation of that same gender trend,� she said.

Men’s costumes are generally goofy or grotesque ensembles with “Animal House�-inspired names like Atomic Wedgie and Chug-A-Lug Beer Can. And when they dress up as police officers, firefighters and soldiers, they actually look like people in those professions. The same costumes for women are so tight and low-cut they are better suited for popping out of a cake than outlasting an emergency.

Obviously, however, many women see nothing wrong with making Halloween less about Snickers bars and SweeTarts and more about eye candy.